Lately I have been doing a lot of thinking about the gender and sexuality spectrum. I've discussed many things, from how we can and should define bisexuality, to whether sexual orientation should be a special class from other attractions. I will most likely do separate posts on each of these but one of the topics which interests me most is that of biological sex. What is sex? What are its defining characteristics? And how does it intersect with our many other characteristics and identities?
All posts edited by Madeline Ricchiuto.
Showing posts with label Queer Theory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Queer Theory. Show all posts
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Feminism and Pornography: Can the two be reconciled? - An open discussion
Today, I attended a discussion/seminar on Human Rights at Durham Law school in the UK. The seminar started off being about discourse surrounding abortion and specifically how Human Rights discourse can help or affects such things.
This has been a major feature in recent political and theoretical discussions due to the tragedy that occurred in Ireland recently (if you aren't sure what I'm talking about click here). The discussion was of course very interesting, but the topic of conversation slowly evolved from an issue of abortion to that of pornography, prostitution, and the like. It came about when discussion started revolving around the idea of autonomy. However an interesting question was posed, one that I know is controversial among feminists and I have seen and heard arguments from both sides of the issue.
This has been a major feature in recent political and theoretical discussions due to the tragedy that occurred in Ireland recently (if you aren't sure what I'm talking about click here). The discussion was of course very interesting, but the topic of conversation slowly evolved from an issue of abortion to that of pornography, prostitution, and the like. It came about when discussion started revolving around the idea of autonomy. However an interesting question was posed, one that I know is controversial among feminists and I have seen and heard arguments from both sides of the issue.
Law and Sexuality: A Theoretical Exploration - Part 1 Defining Terms/Concepts
Often
times the law does not reflect academic results. This is especially
true when it comes to mental disorders and issues of psychology. A
big area that the law doesn't seem to recognize or understand fully
seems to be the idea of human sexuality. Human sexuality is complex,
and our understanding of it ever growing, but it seems difficult for
the law to keep up with developments in the academic fields.
Sexuality
is first broken down into three main categories:
Sexual
Identity, which constitutes one's inner feelings about themselves in
relation to others and even their bodies. It incorporates the
biological aspect of sex, but also things around intercourse.
Sexual
Expression, is similar to identity in that it also incorporates
biological sex and intercourse, but as the name implies it is more
about how such things are expressed. It seems to be a more physical
whereas sexual identity is more internalized and metaphysical, and
has to do with self association.
And
then Gender. Gender has to do with ones social role and social
identities.
Each
of these categories are part of sexuality as they have to do
with how you relate to yourself and others sexually, as well as your
sexual desires and actions. Each aspect can be broken down into other
aspects that address such desires and relations more specifically.
Labels:
Asexuality,
Bisexuality,
Gender,
Gender minority,
Intersex,
Issues of Humanity,
Law,
LGBT,
Pansexuality,
Politics,
Queer Theory,
Sex,
Sexual orientation,
Sexual preference,
Sexuality,
Trans*
A More Inclusive Acronym? LGBTQ, GSD, GSM
There are those who add more letters, "A's" for Allies, or Asexual (or both), P's for Pansexual, and almost countless others. However there has been a growing movement that rejects this idea of just adding more letters to this already seemingly long acronym. A more inclusive term, if you will. An advocacy group called Pink Therapy in London posted a video discussion about how and why the current acronym may not be ideal for such a movement.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
